         
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unclaimed Property &#38; Escheatment &#187; Dormancy Periods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/category/dormancy-periods/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com</link>
	<description>Unclaimed Property &#38; Escheatment : Law, Reporting, and Compliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dormancy Periods for Unclaimed Property Continue to Trend Downward</title>
		<link>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/dormancy-periods-for-unclaimed-property-continue-to-trend-downward</link>
		<comments>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/dormancy-periods-for-unclaimed-property-continue-to-trend-downward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keane Unclaimed Property Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dormancy Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gift Card Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gift Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe Deposit Boxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/?p=2523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing a nationwide trend, South Dakota recently introduced legislation that would reduce the dormancy periods for unclaimed property from five to three years. Specifically, South Dakota’s HB 1270 would decrease the dormancy periods for the following types of unclaimed property: Money Orders Any sum payable on a check, draft, or similar instrument All Banking Property [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuing a nationwide trend, South Dakota recently introduced legislation that would reduce the <a title="View articles on Dormancy Periods" href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/category/dormancy-periods">dormancy periods for unclaimed property</a> from five to three years. Specifically, South Dakota’s HB 1270 would decrease the dormancy periods for the following types of unclaimed property:</p>
<ul>
<li>Money Orders</li>
<li>Any sum payable on a check, draft, or similar instrument</li>
<li>All <a title="Unclaimed Property for Banks" href="http://keaneunclaimedproperty.com/unclaimed-property-banking.aspx">Banking Property</a></li>
<li>All Life Insurance Property (from 4 years)</li>
<li>All Securities Property Types</li>
<li>All property held by a fiduciary including IRA property</li>
<li>Gift certificates and credit memos</li>
<li>Any tangible and intangible property held in a safe deposit box</li>
<li>All other property not specifically addressed in the South Dakota’s unclaimed property law</li>
</ul>
<div><span id="more-2523"></span></div>
<p>The only type of property unaffected by HB 1270 is traveler’s checks, which retains its dormancy period of 15 years.</p>
<p>South Dakota is the most recent state to attempt to reduce dormancy periods for unclaimed property. Since 2007, 21 other states have passed legislation to do so. To put this into perspective, let’s look solely at the banking industry. In 2003, 36 of the 54 reporting jurisdictions had five-year dormancy periods, while only 12 had three-year periods. Since that time, the numbers have shifted as 30 jurisdictions still maintain a five-year dormancy period, and 21 operate under a three-year period.</p>
<p>These numbers are slightly more drastic for securities property, where the number of jurisdictions operating with a five-year dormancy period has decreased from 36 to 20 since 2001 and the number of jurisdictions utilizing a three-year period rose from 9 to 20 in that same period.</p>
<p>If in fact SD HB 1270 is passed, it will go into effect July 1, 2012. Check back for any future developments on SD HB 1270 and similar legislation.</p>
<p><a title="Go to the Unclaimed Property Blog" href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com">Go From Dormancy Periods for Unclaimed Property Continue to Trend Downward back to the Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/dormancy-periods-for-unclaimed-property-continue-to-trend-downward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Gift Card Escheatment Update: Third Circuit Rejects “Place of Presumption” Provision</title>
		<link>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/new-jersey-gift-card-escheatment-update</link>
		<comments>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/new-jersey-gift-card-escheatment-update#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keane Unclaimed Property Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dormancy Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gift Card Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/?p=2445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its opinion in the case of New Jersey Retail Merchants Association v. Sidamon-Eristoff which concerns several plaintiffs’ challenges against NJ A3002, the bill passed on June 30, 2010.  The bill featured major changes to New Jersey’s approach to unclaimed gift [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its opinion in the case of New Jersey Retail Merchants Association v. Sidamon-Eristoff which concerns several plaintiffs’ challenges against NJ A3002, the bill passed on June 30, 2010.  The bill featured major changes to New Jersey’s approach to unclaimed gift certificates, stored value cards, and gift card escheatment; beginning with the requirement that they be reported, which was previously not the case in New Jersey.  Also, holders were to record the zip code of gift card purchasers and, if the address of the purchaser was unknown, holders were to report those cards to New Jersey on the basis of a “place of purchase” presumption.</p>
<p>As <a title="New Jersey Gift Card Law: Third Circuit Hears Oral Arguments" href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/new-jersey-gift-card-law" target="_blank">previously discussed here</a>, Keane had described how the District Court in New Jersey held that the “place of purchase” presumption ran afoul of the priority rules outlined in the United States Supreme Court opinion of Texas v. New Jersey and granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, and now the Third Circuit has affirmed that decision of the District Court.</p>
<p>While the Third Circuit agreed with the District Court that the “place of purchase” presumption was invalid, the Third Circuit upheld New Jersey’s right to require holders to collect zip codes from gift card purchasers.  The District Court had granted the preliminary injunction against the zip code collection requirement, also referred to as the data collection requirement, on the basis that its only purpose was to facilitate the escheatment of gift cards pursuant to the “place of purchase” presumption.  The Third Circuit held that the zip code collection requirement was severable from the “place of purchase” presumption.  The Third Circuit stated that this data collection is consistent with the Supreme Court holdings in Texas v. New Jersey and other decisions because those decisions have consistently allowed for states to escheat pursuant to the last known address of the purchaser.  The opinion of the Third Circuit is vague as to whether or not the Third Circuit considered a zip code as solely sufficient to establish an address to report unclaimed property under the first priority rule in Texas v. New Jersey.</p>
<p><span id="more-2445"></span>The Third Circuit also considered the application of New Jersey’s new gift card escheatment provisions.  The original law had attempted to apply retroactively to gift card and stored value card property.  The Third Circuit agrees with the District Court that the law cannot be applied retroactively as it infringes on contractual relationships of the issuers of the stored value cards.  However, the Third Circuit did uphold New Jersey’s ability to apply its two-year dormancy for gift cards prospectively.  The state’s basis for the law had been challenged as it was alleged that raising revenue was the sole motivation behind the bill.  The Third Circuit stated that as long as raising revenue was not the only legitimate purpose, the legislation passes the rational basis test and is therefore constitutional.</p>
<p>To summarize, the Third Circuit’s decision prevents New Jersey from enforcing its “place of purchase” presumption which violates Texas v. New Jersey, but New Jersey has been given clearance to enforce its zip code collection requirement and its new two-year dormancy provision for stored value cards and gift card escheatment.  While holders should certainly begin their preparations to comply with the surviving portions of New Jersey’s new gift card and stored value card law, the Third Circuit’s decision is an important installment in the legacy of Texas v. New Jersey and the courts’ willingness to adhere to the priority rules.  Keane is available to guide you and your company through any issues with complying with the new law, and will be monitoring any further developments should they arise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/new-jersey-gift-card-escheatment-update/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winter 2010: State Unclaimed Property Laws, Dormancy Periods, &amp; Reporting Legislative / Regulatory Updates</title>
		<link>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/winter-2010-state-unclaimed-property-laws-dormancy-periods-reporting-legislative-regulatory-updates</link>
		<comments>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/winter-2010-state-unclaimed-property-laws-dormancy-periods-reporting-legislative-regulatory-updates#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keane Unclaimed Property Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dormancy Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Reporting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/?p=1849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WINTER 2011 (Current through 12/13/10) Legislative Update Key Introduced – used for Legislation Passed – used for Legislation Proposed – used for Regulations Adopted –used for Regulations Prefiled – drafted bills and resolutions to be numbered, printed, made available for public review, and scheduled for hearing before the actual start of session. Gift Card Escheatment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WINTER 2011 (Current through 12/13/10)</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
<td width="609" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Legislative Update Key</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="609" valign="top">
<p><strong>Introduced</strong><strong> </strong><strong>– used for Legislation</strong><br />
      <strong>Passed</strong><strong> </strong><strong>– used for Legislation</strong><br />
      <strong>Proposed</strong><strong> </strong><strong>– used for Regulations</strong><br />
      <strong>Adopted</strong><strong> </strong><strong>–used for Regulations</strong><br />
      <strong>Prefiled</strong><strong> </strong><strong>– drafted bills and resolutions to be numbered,    printed, made available for public review, and scheduled for hearing before    the actual start of session.</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h2>Gift Card Escheatment Regulations</h2>
<p><strong>CALIFORNIA GIFT CARD  ESCHEATMENT</strong><strong><br />
    <strong>SB 885</strong></strong><br />
    Introduced  1/19/2010, Passed 8/25/2010, Vetoed by Governor 9/24/2010<br />
    This  bill would require that a <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/category/gift-card-escheatment">gift  certificate</a> with a cash value of less than $10 be redeemable  in cash for its cash value, and would require that a gift certificate contain a  statement to that effect. This bill would also delete the exceptions to the  prohibition on the sale of a gift certificate that contains a dormancy fee.</li>
<p><span id="more-1849"></span></p>
<p><strong>NEW JERSEY  GIFT CARD ESCHEATMENT </strong></p>
<p><strong>HB 3330</strong><strong><br />
    </strong>Introduced  10/7/2010<br />
    This bill provides that <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/nj-abandoned-property-gift-card-travelers-check">gift  cards and gift certificates</a> be redeemable at full face value  in perpetuity. The bill also creates a separate category of &#8220;store gift card&#8221;  which is a gift card that is redeemable at a single retail mercantile  establishment or an affiliated group of retail mercantile establishments that  share the same name, mark or logo. As to stored gift cards, the bill requires a  retail mercantile establishment, at which a stored gift card is redeemable, to:  (1) upon request, disclose to the consumer the remaining value of the stored  gift card; and (2) permit a transaction in an amount that is less than the  remaining value of the stored gift card.</p>
<p>    <strong>HB 3315</strong><br />
    Introduced  10/7/2010<br />
    This bill makes it an unlawful practice for a retail mercantile establishment  to advertise merchandise for sale indicating the availability of a rebate that  is to be redeemable as a gift card, gift certificate, prepaid bank card, or  stored gift card without disclosing that the rebate is available only as a gift  card, gift certificate prepaid bank card, or stored gift card. These  disclosures must be made by retail mercantile establishments in advertisements  of the rebate and at the time of sale.</p>
<p>    <strong>SB 2407</strong><strong><br />
      </strong>Introduced  11/8/2010<br />
    This bill exempts stored value cards usable solely for telephone services from <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/category/state-escheatment">State&#8217;s  escheatment</a> processes.
</p>
<h2>State Dormancy Periods Legislation</h2>
<p>    <strong>MICHIGAN DORMANCY PERIODS</strong><strong><br />
      <strong>HB 6421</strong></strong><br />
    Introduced  9/8/2010, Passed House 9/16/2010, Passed Senate 9/23/2010, Signed by Governor  10/5/2010<br />
    This bill reduces <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/michigan-hb-6421-passes-the-senate-with-proposed-reductions-in-unclaimed-property-dormancy-period">dormancy  periods</a> as follows:</p>
<p>    1. General dormancy period from 5 years to 3 years<br />
    2. Money orders from 7 years to 3 years<br />
    3. Any sum payable on a check, draft, or similar instrument from 5 years to 3  years<br />
    4. Any demand, savings, matured time deposit or funds paid toward the purchase  of a share, a mutual investment certificate, or any other interest in a banking  or financial organization from 5 years to 3 years<br />
    <strong>5. Trust accounts and accounts  under the gifts to minors act from 15 years to 3 years</strong><br />
    6. Funds owed under any life or endowment insurance policy from 5 years to 3  years<br />
    7. Gift cards from 5 years to 3 years</p>
<p>    Starting in 2011, the report shall be filed on or before July 1 for the 9-month  period ending on March 21, 2011. For years ending after December 31, 2011, the  report shall be filed on or before July 1 of each year for the 12-month period  ending on the immediately preceding March 31.</p>
<p>    <strong>MISSOURI DORMANCY PERIODS</strong><strong><br />
      <strong>HB 64</strong></strong><br />
    Introduced  12/7/2010<br />
    This bill proposes to reduce the <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/category/dormancy-periods">dormancy  period</a> for payroll checks from 5 years to 1 year beginning  January 1, 2012. </li>
</p>
<p><strong>NEW JERSEY  DORMANCY PERIODS</strong><strong><br />
    <strong>NJ 3250</strong></strong><br />
    Introduced  9/20/2010<br />
    This bill proposes to reverse the changes to the <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/new-jersey-unclaimed-property-law-revision-leads-to-legal-trouble">unclaimed  property law</a> just recently enacted with the passage of A3002. A  3250 proposes to do the following: </p>
<p>    1. Restore the dormancy period for travelers checks to 15 years (from 3 years)<br />
    2. Restore the dormancy period for money orders to 7 years (from 3 years)<br />
    3. Restore the previous statutory standard of unconscionability for limiting  service charges on travelers checks<br />
    4. Restore the statutory standard of unconscionability for limiting fees  associated with a failure to redeem a credit balance, customer overpayment, security  deposit, refund, credit memorandum, unused ticket, and similar instruments<br />
    5. Eliminate the State&#8217;s claim on unused stored value cards (i.e. return stored  value cards to exempt status)<br />
    6. Eliminate A3002&#8242;s requirement that businesses gather contact information  from customers buying gift cards. </p>
<p>  Lastly, the bill grants the State Treasurer emergency regulatory authority to  implement the proposed changes and to reimburse issuers that reported unclaimed  property under the recent 2010 changes, which otherwise would not have been due  as reportable.</p>
<h2>Unclaimed  Property Audit Regulations</h2>
<p>  <strong>NEVADA UNCLAIMED PROPERTY AUDIT</strong><strong><br />
    <strong>NV 5137</strong></strong><br />
  Proposed  8/17/2010<br />
  Nevada has proposed a regulation relating to unclaimed property establishing  requirements relating to the selection of persons to be <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/category/unclaimed-property-audit">audited  by the Administrator of Unclaimed Property</a>. Five percent of  audits would be conducted at random. The other 95% of audits would be conducted  based upon an objective method established by the Administrator using common  risk factors and other weighted criteria deemed useful by the Administrator.  The details of the objective method shall be confidential.</p>
<h2>Unclaimed Property Reporting Laws<strong></h2>
<p>  <strong>TENNESSEE UNCLAIMED PROPERTY REPORTING</strong><br />
    <strong>TN 1700-02-01.01, .04, .05, .38</strong><br />
  Proposed  9/30/2010<br />
  On September 30, 2010, the Tennessee Unclaimed Property Department proposed  amendments to the administrative rules regarding <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/tennessee-proposed-unclaimed-property-laws-reporting">reporting  of unclaimed property</a>. The primary changes include: <br />
  (1) 1700-02-01-.01 Organizations and Individuals Required to Report. Currently,  this rule states that businesses employing less than twenty-five (25) employees  do not have to file unclaimed property reports with the State. This rule  conflicts with the Unclaimed Property Act in that the Act applies to all  businesses regardless of the number of employees they employ. The proposed rule  would delete the exception to make it consistent with the Act. </p>
<p>  (2) 1700-02-01-.04 Reporting Forms. Currently, this rule requires <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/corporate-unclaimed-property-compliance-insights">unclaimed  property holders</a> to file their unclaimed property reports with  the State Treasurer on electronic media as prescribed by the Treasurer if the  report will contain twenty (20) or more unclaimed property owner records. If  the report will contain less than twenty (20) unclaimed property owner records,  the respective holder has the option of filing the report in paper form or in  electronic media. This proposed rule would require <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/category/unclaimed-property-reporting">unclaimed  property reports</a> to be filed on electronic media as prescribed  by the Treasurer regardless of the number of unclaimed property owner records  that will be on the report. The proposed rule would give the Treasurer the  authority to waive this requirement with respect to any holder if it would be  too costly or oppressive. In which case, the holder would file the report in  paper form, or in such other alternate electronic media as the Treasurer deems  acceptable. </p>
<p>  (3) 1700-02-01-.05 Alternative Reporting Forms Accepted by the State Treasurer.  Currently, this rule provides that a holder of unclaimed property may file an  unclaimed property report in such other alternate electronic media as the  Treasurer deems acceptable upon prior written approval of the Treasurer. This  rule would no longer be needed since it would be addressed in the above  proposed rule amendment and, therefore, it is proposed that this rule be  deleted. </p>
<p>  4) 1700-02-01-.38 Agreements Relative to Unreported Property. This proposed  rule would delete an outdated Internet web site for obtaining information about  Tennessee&#8217;s <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/unclaimed-property-compliance-reporting">unclaimed  property program</a>. Proposed effective date is 2/28/11.</p>
<p>  <strong>TEXAS</strong><strong> UNCLAIMED PROPERTY REPORTING </strong><strong><br />
    <strong>TX TAC 55.142</strong></strong><br />
  Proposed  8/20/2010, Adopted 10/8/2010, Effective 10/11/2010<br />
  The proposed section outlines Child Support Division policy for reporting of  child support payments held for disbursement as <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/texas-unclaimed-property-reporting">unclaimed  property in Texas</a>. Child support payments being held for  disbursement by the state disbursement unit or a local registry may be reported  as unclaimed property as outlined in the Texas Property Code. If the location of  the person to whom the money is owed is unknown, the Title IV-D agency will  conduct periodic attempts to locate the owner of the payments. If, after three  years from the date the child support payments have been held, there has been  no contact by the property owner and attempts to locate the owner have failed,  the child support payments may be reported as unclaimed property. If locate  information is present at the end of a reporting period, the reporting of the  unclaimed payments may be deferred to the next reporting period.</p>
<p>  <strong>WASHINGTON</strong><strong> UNCLAIMED PROPERTY REPORTING</strong><strong><br />
    <strong>WAC 208-680</strong></strong><br />
  Proposed  8/18/2010<br />
  The Escrow Agent Registration Act. This regulation, among other things,  outlines the obligations of trust officers concerning unclaimed funds in their  accounts. The regulation requires trust officers to conduct quarterly  examinations of their accounts in order to locate unclaimed funds.  </li>
</p>
<p>Go back to <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/category/legislative-updates">view all recent legislative  updates</a></p>
<p>Go from <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/">Winter 2010 Unclaimed Property Legislative Update back to the  main blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/winter-2010-state-unclaimed-property-laws-dormancy-periods-reporting-legislative-regulatory-updates/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unclaimed Property Article in Kansas City Star</title>
		<link>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/unclaimed-property-article-in-kansas-city-star</link>
		<comments>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/unclaimed-property-article-in-kansas-city-star#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keane Unclaimed Property Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dormancy Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/?p=1066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As state budget deficits continue to grow so does the topic of unclaimed property. Today, more and more businesses and financial institutions are reporting large amounts in abandoned property, much of which will eventually go to the state treasury instead of its rightful owner. Here at Keane Unclaimed Property, our main objective is to provide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As state budget deficits continue to grow so does the topic of unclaimed property. Today, more and more businesses and financial institutions are reporting large amounts in abandoned property, much of which will eventually go to the state treasury instead of its rightful owner.</p>
<p>Here at Keane Unclaimed Property, our main objective is to provide <a href="http://www.keaneup.com/business-risk-management-solutions/Home.aspx">corporate compliance and risk management solutions </a>to corporations, mutual funds and financial institutions. However, we’re also dedicated to helping consumers who are the customers, shareholders and employees of those firms.</p>
<p>In a recent Kansas City Star article titled <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/2010/10/22/2344667/states-have-millions-in-unclaimed.html">“States Have Millions in Unclaimed Property”</a>, Debbie Zumoff, Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer at Keane Unclaimed Property, mentions that “consumers need to understand the importance of demonstrating activity in their accounts.”<span id="more-1066"></span></p>
<p>According to the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators,</p>
<p>nearly $33 billion in unclaimed property is being held in 117 million accounts nationwide and that includes over $200 million in Kansas and $600 million in Missouri. For consumers living in these states, this money comes in the form of bank accounts, stocks and bonds, uncashed checks, life insurance policies, and gold coins and security box contents. The typical dormancy period on these accounts is usually 3 to 5 years and after that period of time, money becomes subject to the state.</p>
<p>However, by keeping a record and staying active on all accounts, consumers can significantly decrease the chances that their money becomes escheated to the state. Even more so, if consumers can make unclaimed property a regular on their financial to do list, they may have an even better chance of holding onto their property.</p>
<p>Go from <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com" title="Click to go back to the Unclaimed Property Blog">Unclaimed Property Article in Kansas City Star back to the blog</a></p>
<p>Go to the <a href="http://www.keaneunclaimedproperty.com/" title="Click to go back to the Keane Homepage">Keane HOMEPAGE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/unclaimed-property-article-in-kansas-city-star/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cayman Island’s Unclaimed Property Law Causes Uproar</title>
		<link>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/cayman-island-unclaimed-property-law-causes-uproar</link>
		<comments>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/cayman-island-unclaimed-property-law-causes-uproar#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keane Unclaimed Property Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dormancy Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheat Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cayman Island]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/?p=1062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With reporting deadlines occurring at the end of this month, we are constantly keeping abreast of issues involving unclaimed property and dormant accounts—even ones occurring outside the United States. A recent article caught our attention from CaymanNewsService titled “Law fundamentally ‘flawed’” as it raised some unclaimed property law issues that have and continue to occur [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With reporting deadlines occurring at the end of this month, we are constantly keeping abreast of issues involving unclaimed property and dormant accounts—even ones occurring outside the United States. A recent article caught our attention from CaymanNewsService titled “<em>Law fundamentally ‘flawed</em>’” as it raised some <a href="http://www.caymannewsservice.com/headline-news/2010/10/12/law-fundamentally-%E2%80%9Cflawed%E2%80%9D">unclaimed property law issues</a> that have and continue to occur state side.<span id="more-1062"></span></p>
<p>In July, the Cayman Islands passed a law called the <a href="http://www.compasscayman.com/caycompass/2010/09/30/Banks-publish-dormant-account-lists/" target="_blank" title="Cayman Island Dormant Accounts Law of 2010">Dormant Accounts Law of 2010</a> that would allow for funds in dormant accounts to be transferred to the general revenue of the islands. Many of the characteristics of the law, such as dormancy periods and due diligence requirements, are similar to that of America’s unclaimed property laws. The general dormancy period for the Dormant Accounts Law is six years and applies to all monies including savings deposits, certified checks, intangible assets and safe deposit boxes in an account held by a financial institution that has been inactive for that period. Also, in addition to the standard due diligence requirement of mailing notices to owners, the Dormant Accounts Law would also require businesses to publish ads in the newspaper when the bank has been instructed not to send correspondence to the account holder. </p>
<p>Recently, however, The Financial Services Legislative Committee of the Cayman Islands (the Committee) sent a memo to the government stating that the law was “fundamentally flawed” as it has potentially dangerous consequences for the financial services industry.</p>
<p>In the eyes of the Committee, neither the financial industry nor the Committee were properly consulted before passage of the bill and the law itself is ambiguous in language. In fact, the scope of the types of accounts that could be seized is almost boundless and could make the Cayman Islands less attractive for financial institutions. </p>
<p>The memo, which included a list of suggested changes and even a rewritten version of the law, is currently in the hands of The Legislative Assembly and will hopefully be reviewed during November’s meeting.</p>
<p>Be sure to check back to see what changes, if any, will be made to the existing law.  </p>
<p>Go from <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com" title="Click to go back to the Unclaimed Property Blog">Cayman Island’s Unclaimed Property Law Causes Uproar back to the blog</a></p>
<p>Go to the <a href="http://www.keaneunclaimedproperty.com/" title="Click to go back to the Keane Homepage">Keane HOMEPAGE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/cayman-island-unclaimed-property-law-causes-uproar/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Unclaimed Property Law Revision Leads to Legal Trouble</title>
		<link>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/new-jersey-unclaimed-property-law-revision-leads-to-legal-trouble</link>
		<comments>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/new-jersey-unclaimed-property-law-revision-leads-to-legal-trouble#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keane Unclaimed Property Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dormancy Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheat Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gift Card Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Travelers Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheat Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/?p=1048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you might have guessed, New Jersey’s attempt to collect an additional $79.5 million in revenue per year by revising the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act is causing a legal uproar in Trenton’s federal court. Monday’s article on Law.com which covered the proposed unclaimed property law revision caught our eye, as there are currently three lawsuits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you might have guessed, New Jersey’s attempt to collect an additional $79.5 million in revenue per year by revising the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act is causing a legal uproar in Trenton’s federal court. Monday’s article on Law.com which covered the proposed <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202473203144&amp;Merchants_Sue_NJ_Over_Funds_From_Unused_Gift_Cards_Travelers_Checks" target="_blank" title="New Jersey Unclaimed Property Law Revision Article on Law.com">unclaimed property law revision</a> caught our eye, as there are currently three lawsuits contesting that the recent revision is pre-empted by federal law and violates the Constitution’s taking, commerce, contract and due process clauses.</p>
<p>So just what does the law say? On July 1, 2010, New Jersey passed a revision to the Uniform Unclaimed Property law stating that gift cards – which were not previously covered by the unclaimed property act – are presumed abandoned after two years. This includes paper gift certificates and rebates cards. The law also reduces the time to redeem travelers’ checks and money orders from 15 years to three years and seven years to three years, respectively. Finally, the law forbids fees charged on stored value cards and limits the amount of dormancy fees businesses can charge on travelers&#8217; checks.</p>
<p>The lawsuits involve American Express Travel Related Services Company, the New Jersey Retailers Association and the New Jersey Food Council, and are all seeking a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the law.<span id="more-1048"></span><br />
</br></p>
<h2>American Express</h2>
<p>Having sued on September 23, American Express argues that New Jersey is the only state to change the abandonment period on travelers’ checks from 15 years to three years. It complains this law in no way benefits owners of travelers’ checks.<br />
</br></p>
<h2>New Jersey Retail Merchants Association</h2>
<p>The NJ Retail Merchants Association, on the other hand, states that the revised law does not align with New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division ruling, <em>Matter of November 8, 1996 </em>Determination of the State of New Jersey, Dept. of Treasury, 309 N.J. Super. 272, which holds that gift cards are not subject to escheatment.<br />
</br></p>
<h2>New Jersey Food Council</h2>
<p>The Food Council believes another portion of the revised law, which applies only to retailers selling more than $250,000 worth of gift cards a year, is unfair since individually owned businesses operating under a common trade name are treated as a single issuer. </p>
<p>In the eyes of some members of New Jersey Legislature, the revised law will protect consumers from dormancy fees and bring order to the state’s unclaimed property laws. However, Assemblymen Patrick Diegnan Jr. and Paul Moriarty are in disagreement. On September 20, they introduced <em>A-3250</em> in an effort to reverse the new law, as they believe that it has caused uncertainty for both businesses and consumers. Stay tuned to see how this all unfolds.</p>
<p>Go from <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com" title="Click to go back to the Unclaimed Property Blog">New Jersey Unclaimed Property Law Revision Leads to Legal Trouble back to the blog</a></p>
<p>Go to the <a href="http://www.keaneunclaimedproperty.com/" title="Click to go back to the Keane Homepage">Keane HOMEPAGE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/new-jersey-unclaimed-property-law-revision-leads-to-legal-trouble/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan HB 6421 &#8211; Signed into Law by the Governor &#8211; Reduces Unclaimed Property Dormancy Periods</title>
		<link>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/michigan-unclaimed-property-law-dormancy-period-hb-6421</link>
		<comments>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/michigan-unclaimed-property-law-dormancy-period-hb-6421#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keane Unclaimed Property Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dormancy Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gift Card Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Money Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/?p=1001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michigan&#8217;s new reporting bill, HB 6421 &#8211; introduced on September 8th, was signed into law by the Governor on October 5, 2010.  The details are summarized below: General dormancy period from 5 to 3 years. Money orders from 7 years to 3 years. Any sum payable on a check, draft, or similar instrument from 5 years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan&#8217;s new reporting bill, <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/billanalysis/Senate/pdf/2009-SFA-6421-F.pdf" target="_blank" title="HB 6421">HB 6421</a> &#8211; introduced on September 8th, was signed into law by the Governor on October 5, 2010.  The details are summarized below:</p>
<ul>
<li>General dormancy period from 5 to 3 years.</li>
<li>Money orders from 7 years to 3 years.</li>
<li>Any sum payable on a check, draft, or similar instrument from 5 years to 3 years.</li>
<li>Demand, savings, matured time deposits including any automatically renewable deposits, from 5 to 3 years.</li>
<li>Trust accounts and accounts under the Gifts to Minors Act, from 15 years to 3 years.</li>
<li>Funds owed under any life or endowment insurance policy, from 5 to 3 years.</li>
<li><strong>Gift Cards, from 5 years to 3 years.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-1001"></span>
<div>The bill also changes the filing deadline for <a href="http://www.keaneup.com/unclaimed-property-services/unclaimed-property-reporting-solutions.aspx" target="_blank" title="unclaimed property reports">unclaimed property reports</a>.  Starting in 2011, the report shall be filed on or before July 1 for the 9-month period ending on March 31, 2011.  For years ending after December 31, 2011, the report shall be filed on or before July 1 of each year for the 12-month period ending on the immediately preceding March 31.</div>
<p>Go from <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com" title="Click to go back to the Unclaimed Property Blog">Michigan Unclaimed Property Law Dormancy Period back to the blog</a></p>
<p>Go to the <a href="http://www.keaneunclaimedproperty.com/" title="Click to go back to the Keane Homepage">Keane HOMEPAGE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/michigan-unclaimed-property-law-dormancy-period-hb-6421/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NJ Abandoned Property: Gift Card and Travelers Check Amendment</title>
		<link>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/nj-abandoned-property-gift-card-travelers-check</link>
		<comments>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/nj-abandoned-property-gift-card-travelers-check#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keane Unclaimed Property Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dormancy Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheat Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gift Card Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travelers Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Travelers Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/?p=970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American Express as well as the New Jersey Retail Merchants Association have targeted a recent law which altered the length of time upon which the state can seize travelers check and unused gift card balances. American Express is concerned with travelers checks and the NJRMA is unhappy with the law’s implications on gift cards. New [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.americanexpress.com/" title="American Express" target="_blank">American Express</a> as well as the <a href="http://www.njrma.org/" target="_blank" title="New Jersey Retail Merchants Association">New Jersey Retail Merchants Association</a> have targeted a recent law which altered the length of time upon which the state can seize travelers check and unused gift card balances.  American Express is concerned with travelers checks and the NJRMA is unhappy with the law’s implications on gift cards.</p>
<p>New Jersey state treasurer, Andrew P. Sidamon-Eristoff, has been hit with two law suits concerning a measure approved back in June of 2010 which was part of the budget recommended by Governor Christie.  The budget called for changes to when a travelers check or gift card could be considered as abandoned, resulting in an estimated $80 million for the state.  Gift cards alone are estimated to generate $33-55 million.<br />
<span id="more-970"></span><br />
The recent amendment included gift cards for the first time ever in the <a href="http://www.unclaimedproperty.nj.gov/pdf/law4630b.pdf" target="_blank" title="New Jersey Uniform Unclaimed Property Act">New Jersey Uniform Unclaimed Property Act</a>.  The adjustment declares cards that have been unused for two years as unclaimed property.</p>
<p>The same amendment addressed travelers checks, stating that the previous 15 year period would be reduced to 3 years concerning when a check may be “presumed abandoned”.  This cleared the treasury to seize proceeds from as far back as 1994 according to the American Expresss suit which also openly identifies New Jersey as the only state that does not adhere to the standard, 15-year period.</p>
<p>American Express believes that the amendment interferes with the power of Congress to regulate trade amongst states, which is granted through the Constitution’s commerce clause.  Mainly, American Express views the new 3 year period as a threat to their business in the state because they typically generate a return by investing the unused money until the check holder spends or cashes the balance.  As a result of a September 13th hearing of the Assembly Consumer Affairs committee where merchants expressed concern, two Democratic Assemblymen introduced a bill on September 20th that would revert the amendment as it applies to travelers checks. </p>
<p>John Holub, president of the NJ Retail Merchants Association, said “We recognize the challenges New Jersey faces in achieving a balanced budget.” But the amendments “are in conflict with the federal system, which is binding on all states,” he added.</p>
<p>The NJRMA also disagrees with the section of the amendment requiring record keeping by retailers for the names and addresses of the “purchaser or owner” of every card.  The intent was for there to be proof that a purchase took place within borders of New Jersey.</p>
<p>A clarification document was released from the NJ treasurer stating that only the zip codes of the purchaser must be recorded and that the recent amendment does not prevent a holder from reclaiming their money back from the state.</p>
<p>This article was inspired by this article in The Record concerning <a href="http://www.northjersey.com/news/state/100410_Retailers_Amex_fight_state_over_abandoned_gift_card_balances.html" target="_blank" title="Abandoned Property: NJ Gift Cards and Travelers Checks">NJ Gift Cards and Travelers Checks</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.keaneunclaimedproperty.com/unclaimed-property-rfp.aspx" target="_blank" title="Contact Keane Unclaimed Property">Contact a Keane Unclaimed Property</a> for more information</p>
<p>Go from <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com" title="Click to go back to the Unclaimed Property Blog">NJ Abandoned Property back to the blog</a></p>
<p>Go to the <a href="http://www.keaneunclaimedproperty.com/" title="Click to go back to the Keane Homepage">Keane HOMEPAGE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/nj-abandoned-property-gift-card-travelers-check/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gift Card Escheatment Laws</title>
		<link>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/gift-card-escheatment-laws</link>
		<comments>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/gift-card-escheatment-laws#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keane Unclaimed Property Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dormancy Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheat Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gift Card Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Reporting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/?p=964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s hard to believe, but the holiday season is only a few months away. According to the National Retail Federation, Americans spent 23.6 billion last holiday season on gift cards alone. That being said, last month new gift card escheatment laws involving unclaimed property and the amount of time consumers have to use gift cards [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s hard to believe, but the holiday season is only a few months away. According to the National Retail Federation, Americans spent 23.6 billion last holiday season on gift cards alone. That being said, last month new <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/category/gift-card-escheatment" target="_blank" title="Gift Card Escheatment Laws">gift card escheatment laws</a> involving unclaimed property and the amount of time consumers have to use gift cards went into effect. While these regulations aim to help consumers, they aren’t crystal clear and leave room for some confusion.</p>
<p>For most states, these new regulations give consumers five years as opposed to one year to use the balance on most gift cards, but they will still have to pay fees for not using them. One major key improvement is that card issuers must wait a year before charging an inactivity fee. However, in a recent <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/39079737" target="_blank" title="Associated Press Interview">Associated Press interview</a>, Laura Lane, vice president of <a href="http://www.keaneup.com/Default.aspx?alias=www.keaneco.com/unclaimed-property-services" target="_blank" title="Keane Unclaimed Property">unclaimed property services</a> here at Keane Unclaimed Property, indicated that this could be both good and bad for consumers.<span id="more-964"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;It could be good for consumers in that they have a year before fees are charged,&#8221; she says. &#8220;However once that year is up, who knows how good for consumers that will be.&#8221;</p>
<p>In addition, the new rules don’t apply to all gift cards and this includes reloadable prepaid cards from MasterCard, Visa, American Express and other lenders, and reward cards or rebates. In fact, Lane says that more and more companies—such as phone companies—are giving rebates in the form of electronic cards because it’s easier for them to track how much is yet to be used.</p>
<p>Some states, however, do not follow this five-year standard. Take for instance New Jersey where Assembly Bill 3002, which was signed into law and went into effect on July 1, 2010, (but has recently been extended to October 1, 2010), requires that gift certificates, gift cards, and stored values cards be turned over to the state after just two years of dormancy. Legislation is on the table, however, to reverse these changes and eliminate the state’s claim on unused store values and eliminate the requirement that businesses gather contact information from customers buying gift cards. Michigan, as well, is expected to pass legislation this month that will reduce dormancy periods across the board &#8211; including gift cards – to 3 years of inactivity.</p>
<p>Moving forward, companies will soon be required to print expiration dates on gift cards. However, this new gift card escheatment law does not take effect until January 31, 2011 meaning that consumers must pay attention this holiday season. If they receive gift cards, they should use them as soon as possible in order to avoid escheatment or complications with the state.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.keaneunclaimedproperty.com/unclaimed-property-rfp.aspx" target="_blank" title="Contact Keane">Contact a Keane Unclaimed Property consultant</a> for more information</p>
<p>Go from <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com" title="Click to go back to the Unclaimed Property Blog">Gift Card Escheatment Laws back to the blog</a></p>
<p>Go to the <a href="http://www.keaneunclaimedproperty.com/" title="Click to go back to the Keane Homepage">Keane HOMEPAGE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/gift-card-escheatment-laws/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan HB 6421  &#8211; Passes the Senate with Proposed Reductions in Unclaimed Property Dormancy Period</title>
		<link>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/michigan-hb-6421-passes-the-senate-with-proposed-reductions-in-unclaimed-property-dormancy-period</link>
		<comments>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/michigan-hb-6421-passes-the-senate-with-proposed-reductions-in-unclaimed-property-dormancy-period#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keane Unclaimed Property Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dormancy Periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gift Card Escheatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travelers Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trust Account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Unclaimed Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/?p=948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michigan&#8217;s new reporting bill, HB 6421 &#8211; introduced on September 8th, passed the Senate yesterday, September 23rd, 2010 with a solid vote of 461 to 36. It has been ordered to be enrolled for the Governor&#8217;s desk. For your reading convenience, details are summarized below: General dormancy period from 5 to 3 years. Travelers checks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Michigan&#8217;s new reporting bill, HB 6421 &#8211; introduced on September 8th, passed the Senate yesterday, September 23rd, 2010 with a solid vote of 461 to 36.</strong> It has been ordered to be enrolled for the Governor&#8217;s desk.  For your reading convenience, details are summarized below:<span id="more-948"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>General dormancy period from 5 to 3 years.</li>
<li>Travelers checks from 15 years to 3 years.</li>
<li>Money orders from 7 years to 3 years.</li>
<li>Any sum payable on a check, draft, or similar instrument from 5 years to 3 years.</li>
<li>Demand, savings, matured time deposits including any automatically renewable deposits, from 5 to 3 years.</li>
<li>Trust accounts and accounts under the Gifts to Minors Act, from 15 years to 3 years.</li>
<li>Funds owed under any life or endowment insurance policy, from 5 to 3 years.</li>
<li>Gift cards, from 5 years to 3 years.</li>
</ul>
<p>The bill also proposes to change the filing deadline for <a href="http://www.keaneup.com/unclaimed-property-services/unclaimed-property-reporting-solutions.aspx" target="_blank" title="Unclaimed Property Reports">unclaimed property reports</a>. Starting in 2011, the report shall be filed on or before July 1 for the 9-month period ending on March 31, 2011.  For years ending after December 31, 2011, the report shall be filed on or before July 1 of each year for the 12-month period ending on the immediately preceding March 31.</p>
<p>In order to have your opinion heard at this point in this legislative process, please direct your calls directly to the Michigan Governor&#8217;s office.</p>
<p>Governor Jennifer M. Granholm<br />
P.O. Box 30013<br />
Lansing, Michigan 48909<br />
<strong>PHONE</strong>: (517) 335-7858 &#8211; Constituent Services</p>
<p>Also, you can submit your comments through the Governor&#8217;s office website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.michigan.gov/gov/0,1607,7-168-21995-65331--,00.html">http://www.michigan.gov/gov/0,1607,7-168-21995-65331&#8211;,00.html</a></p>
<p>Go from <a href="http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com" title="Click to go back to the Unclaimed Property Blog">Michigan HB 6421 back to the blog</a></p>
<p>Go to the <a href="http://www.keaneunclaimedproperty.com/" title="Click to go back to the Keane Homepage">Keane HOMEPAGE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unclaimed-property.keaneco.com/michigan-hb-6421-passes-the-senate-with-proposed-reductions-in-unclaimed-property-dormancy-period/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

